Name Suppression: Balancing Open Justice and Privacy Cross-ExaminationThe Equal Justice Project18 September 2024Cross Examination, name suppression, sexual offending, Supreme Court, Justice, youth, youth court, court order, name protection, identity protection, law, protection, criminal law
From Triad to Trial: Polyamory's Property Predicament Splits Courts Amicus CuriaeThe Equal Justice Project19 June 2023Paul v Mead, Property Relationships Act, Polyamory, Polyamorous relationship, Family Court, Supreme Court, New Zealand, Family Law, Property Distribution
Does Less Time Mean Less Wine? Reducing Alcohol-Related Harm in Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland Amicus CuriaeThe Equal Justice Project1 June 2023alcohol, harm, related, alcohol related harm, trading hours, bottle store, liquor store, supermarket, woolworths, Supreme Court, Auckland Council, Licence, restrictions, Amendment, Bill, Authority, High Court, Court of Appeal, preloading, Act, Minimising, Proposal
A Change of Climate for Tort Law? A Potential Precedent in Smith v Fonterra Cross-ExaminationThe Equal Justice Project29 November 2022law, climate change, climate, environment, High Court, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court, Precedent, Fonterra, Smith, Earth, Tort, Z Energy, Breach
Amicus Curiae: "I did my waiting. 12 years of it. In Azkaban!" - The Department of Corrections and the Prison Sentence Blunder Amicus Curiaeejp_comms8 October 2016compensation, corrections, court, Department of Corrections, fail, government, jasper lau, Judith Collins, justice, limitation act, minister of corrections, miscarriage of justice, New Zealand Bill of Rights Act, NZBORA, parole act, prison, Supreme Court
Cross-Examination: Mr Big – Entrapment in the Name of Evidence, or a Risk Not Worth the Reward? Cross-Examinationejp_comms4 October 2016abuse of criminal process, admissibility of evidence, canada, coercion, constraints on police interrogation, crime scenario undercover technique, elias cj, foreign jurisdictions, glazebrook j, hannah yang, high court of australia, impropriety considerations, kamal reddy, mr big, police questioning, prejudice, r v hart, r v johnston, r v wichman, social poverty, Supreme Court, the evidence act 2006, tofilau v the queen, william young j, wrongful convictions
Amicus Curiae: Teaching an Old Act New Tricks – The Social Security Legislation Rewrite Bill 2016 Amicus Curiaeejp_comms2 August 2016Amicus Curiae, Anne Tolley, arbuthnot v chief executive of the department of work and income, Blanchard J, canterbury community law centre, child welfare payments, naushyn janah, policy-neutral rewrite of existing policy, social development minister, Social Security Act, social security legislation rewrite bill 2016, social welfare, stigma of being on a benefit, supported child payment, Supreme Court
Supreme Work EJP Pro Bono does research for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. Read More Completed Researchejp_comms12 May 2013New Zealand Bill of Rights, Pro Bono, Supreme CourtComment